“If peer review was a drug it would never be allowed on the market.”

no climate consensus link

CLINTEL, climate intelligence (Holland) over 800 global scientists, no climate emergency link

the 97% myth, friends of science link

500+ Scientists sign there is no climate emergency link

400 scientific papers in 2020 question the climate emergency link

500+ scientific papers 2018 support skeptics position on climate alarm link

1,350 peer reviewed scientific papers that support climate skeptics position link 

Over 440 published scientific papers in 2019 support the skeptics position link

Over 1,000 internationally recognized scientists, including Nobel winners, who are climate skeptics link

90 leading Italian Scientists CO2 impact on climate "unjustyfiably exaggerated, catastrophic predictions not realistic" link

Peer review, why skepticism is essential. Sound science requires critically testing theories and predictions – including those published in peer-reviewed science journals – against objective evidence.

The lesson to be learned is the liberal media engage in laziness or deliberate misrepresentation when they cherry-pick certain peer-reviewed studies and claim that anybody who questions them is “attacking science,” “attacking scientists,” or being a “denialist.” link

List of scientists, wikipedia, skeptics, think alarm overblown, no consensus etc link

“We note that defenders of the climate consensus have already mounted a public campaign against the proposed commission.  We find this opposition curious.  If the defenders are confident that the science contained in official reports is robust, then they should welcome a review that would finally put to rest the doubts that have been raised.  On the other hand, their opposition could be taken as evidence that the scientific basis of the climate consensus is in fact highly suspect and cannot withstand critical review.”

Australian dog sits on the board of seven medical journals and has been asked to peer review scientific papers link 

600 peer reviewed scientific papers confirming solar activity has a major impact on the climate link

Why most published research findings are false link

Review education research. The National Reading Panel found the 10,000 published papers in level 1 research journals weren’t worth the paper they were written on.

Review the research record on eugenics. The climate change hysteria of its time, it ran for 70 years. Thousands of "citations". All came to an instantaneous end when they discovered Auschwitz. 

Review the record on diet science. Truth was bottled up and denied for decades. 

Review Ignatz Semmelweiss. First scientist to discover the germ theory of disease, he had his doctors plunge their arms in chlorine solution. Instantly his baby death rates plunged by 70%. He was ridiculed to death... by leading scientists. 

 Hohenkammer Consensus Statement, named after the German town where 32 of the leading scientists in the field gathered in 2006 to sort out the evidence. They concluded that trends toward rising climate damages were mainly due to increased population and economic activity in the path of storms, that it was not currently possible to determine the portion of damages attributable to greenhouse gases, and that they didn’t expect that situation to change in the near future.