Greenhouse effect deception explained link

The term “greenhouse effect” with respect to the atmosphere is an unfortunate analogy because it is misleading. The interior of a real greenhouse (or your automobile parked with windows closed and left in the sun) heats up because there is a physical barrier to convective heat loss. There is no such physical barrier in the atmosphere. The greenhouse hypothesis deals only with heat transfer by radiation and completely ignores convective heat transfer. Convective heat transfer (weather) puts many holes in the “blanket” of carbon dioxide. The “greenhouse” is effectively broken.

If an actual greenouse can explain how CO2 warms the atmosphere then answer this question. There are two greenhouses, one raises the level of CO2 to increase plant growth and health. One does not. Is the air temperature in the greenhouse that raises CO2 levels from the normal 400ppm to over 1,000ppm warmer than the one that does not? The answer is no, temperatures are the same. Thus, the greenhouse effect does not accurately explain how CO2 is a major driver of temperatures. It does not explain how the atmosphere works either. This is also shown in the geological history of Earth. CO2 levels were much higher than today in most of the past 600 million years. CO2 levels do not correlate with temperatures, there were three ice ages, for example, with more CO2 than today, one had fifteent times more, one five.

CO2’s influence is minimal and easily overwhelmed in these processes, as “the greenhouse effect of clouds may be larger than that resulting from a hundredfold increase in the CO2 concentration of the atmosphere.”

The greenhouse effect, such as CO2, traps heat in the atmosphere and directs part of it back to the surface, this heat can not penetrate into the ocean itself, where 93% of the Globe's heat energy is located. Only solar energy, which is regulated by clouds, can do that.

CO2’s influence is minimal and easily overwhelmed in these processes, as “the greenhouse effect of clouds may be larger than that resulting from a hundredfold increase in the CO2 concentration of the atmosphere.”